FacebookTwitter

HAI

Unless otherwise indicated, the material below has not been prepared by Van Eck Associates Corporation or HardAssetsInvestor.com.
Neither assumes any liability for any content on a third party website or material prepared by a third party.

Features and Interviews

   |
Poor Nothing special Worth watching Pretty cool Awesome!
Rate this article
MLPs: Profit In The Pipelines?
Written by Lara Crigger   
March 10, 2009 11:06 am EDT

 

Despite conservation efforts, the U.S.' existing energy infrastructure just can't keep up with our ever-increasing thirst for energy. By 2030, Americans will require an estimated 131.2 quadrillion BTUs of energy - up 33% from 2005. We need repairs, upgrades and expansions, and we need them fast.

Many investors have already started piling into energy infrastructure, looking for ways to tap into its inevitable market surge. But the best play may be one you've never even heard of: the master limited partnership (MLP).

MLPs are limited partnerships, specializing in mineral and natural resource development, that can be traded on securities exchanges. Investors buy and sell MLP "units" just like shares of stock, but instead of receiving dividends, "unit holders" get cash distributions typical of a partnership structure.

Poorly understood and often overlooked, MLPs are the Rodney Dangerfield of asset classes: Even after 20 years, they still can't get no respect. But as interest in infrastructure swells, their combination of liquidity and tax efficiency - not to mention their historically high returns - make MLPs a promising way for investors to jump into the coming energy infrastructure boom.

 

MLPs: A Different Kind of Partnership

Established by Congress in the 1980s, MLPs were originally developed to spur investment in energy and natural resource projects. According to the Revenue Act of 1987, only companies engaged in "the exploration, production, mining, processing, refining, marketing or transportation" of mineral and natural resources may use this structure.[1]

Today, there are about 100 MLPs, more than 75% of which are energy infrastructure companies. These partnerships run a variety of business - including pipelines, refineries, processing plants and more - for a range of natural resources: oil, coal, propane, natural gas, timber - even "alternative" fuels like ethanol and biodiesel.

Because most MLPs own physical assets that operate independently of the commodities transported, processed or refined, the income of these companies depends less on energy prices and more on energy demand. And since demand is much less volatile than pricing, MLP income remains relatively stable even when energy prices go haywire. So unit holders usually see a steady, predictable increase in their cash distributions.

MLPs offer other advantages, too, including:

 

  • Consistently high yields that outperform other assets.
    In the past, the average current yield of MLPs has ranged anywhere from 7-10%, and currently it hovers above 8%, according to industry leader Kayne Anderson Capital Advisors.

    That's not to say MLPs were immune to last year's market implosion-they weren't. But historically, they have outperformed other asset classes, such as stocks; between 1998 and 2007, MLPs beat the S&P 500 seven out of 10 years.

  • Low correlation to other asset classes.
    Historically, MLPs have only weakly correlated with other assets, making them a good diversification tool.

 

 

MLP Correlations With Other Asset Classes

Asset

2007

July 2007-July 2008

3-Year

5-Year

S&P 500

0.43

0.43

0.43

0.40

Natural Gas

0.02

0.10

0.13

0.14

Crude Oil

0.26

0.34

0.31

0.31

10-Yr. Treasury

0.24

0.36

0.19

0.07

Utilities

0.36

0.29

0.41

0.40

REITs

0.35

0.21

0.30

0.32

Corporate Bonds

0.03

-0.01

0.00

-0.07

Data: Wachovia

 

Of course, in 2008, correlations between all asset classes skyrocketed, including MLPs. But history suggests this rise may be short term, and as the markets settle down, MLPs may adjust back into their historical patterns.

 



 

 
Subscribe to Our Weekly Newsletter 
First Comment

Comments (0)



Post a Comment

Comment
(Limit 2,000
characters) 
*
Name: *
E-mail: *
Home page:

(optional)

Type in the displayed characters
Email follow-up comments to my e-mail address
 


Terms of Use
The HardAssetsInvestor.com message board and comment features are designed to facilitate thoughtful discussion of the biggest issues impacting commodity investors. All comments should be respectful. Insults and profanity are not permitted. The editor reserves the right to remove comments at his/her discretion.

 

Related Articles »

Did you like this article? Then you may be interested in:

  • An Interview With Michael Metz
    Michael Metz, chief investment strategist for Oppenheimer & Company, lays out his opinions on each segment of the commodities market.
    December 06, 2007
  • A Real Commodity Moneymaker
    Real-time Inflation Indicator (per annum): 9.2% Wednesday's column ("2008 Was Golden ...
    January 08, 2009
  • Walter Nasdeo, Ardour Capital, Discusses Alternative Energy Stocks: Part I
    The Director of Research for Ardour Capital says alternative energy and ethanol are "here to stay." Corn-based ethanol isn't going away The alternative energy market is maturing The relationship between alternative energy and oil prices
    April 01, 2008
  • The Bush Budget
    What does the new Bush budget mean for renewable energy, fossil fuels and other commodities? It's 6% more, but what about commodities? Energy security? What happened to renewables?
    February 05, 2008
  • An Interview With ‘Trader Vic’
    Victor Sperandeo … aka “Trader Vic” … is one of the most famous commodity traders in the world.
    January 14, 2008
 

Commodities Data

September 08, 2010 02:45 PM EST

  Loading data ...
 

Weekly Commodities Poll

Do you think futures-based ETFs have a significant effect on commodities prices?

 

Related Articles »

Did you like this article? Then you may be interested in:

  • An Interview With Michael Metz
    Michael Metz, chief investment strategist for Oppenheimer & Company, lays out his opinions on each segment of the commodities market.
    December 06, 2007
  • A Real Commodity Moneymaker
    Real-time Inflation Indicator (per annum): 9.2% Wednesday's column ("2008 Was Golden ...
    January 08, 2009
  • Walter Nasdeo, Ardour Capital, Discusses Alternative Energy Stocks: Part I
    The Director of Research for Ardour Capital says alternative energy and ethanol are "here to stay." Corn-based ethanol isn't going away The alternative energy market is maturing The relationship between alternative energy and oil prices
    April 01, 2008
  • The Bush Budget
    What does the new Bush budget mean for renewable energy, fossil fuels and other commodities? It's 6% more, but what about commodities? Energy security? What happened to renewables?
    February 05, 2008
  • An Interview With ‘Trader Vic’
    Victor Sperandeo … aka “Trader Vic” … is one of the most famous commodity traders in the world.
    January 14, 2008
 

Seminal Papers »